Help Enforce Broadcast Decency

By Richard Land - Jul 30, 2008 - 2

A federal court has in effect given the green light for broadcast television networks to air indecent material any hour of the day.

That’s why Congress must act now on the Protecting Children from Indecent Programming Act (S. 1780)!

Earlier this month, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals threw out a $550,000 fine imposed on CBS by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for airing the now infamous Janet Jackson “wardrobe malfunction” during the Super Bowl halftime show in 2004. According to the court, a “fleeting image,” such as Jackson’s bared breast, does not qualify as indecent content. This egregious decision ignores more than a half-million complaints to the FCC and leaves that agency virtually powerless to enforce a broadcast indecency bill passed by Congress with your help in 2006.

It’s time to take back the airwaves while we still can!

If you agree, please call Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-WV) and urge him to do everything in his power to have Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) bring the Protecting Children from Indecent Programming Act (S. 1780) to the Senate floor immediately.

Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV
(202) 224-6472

Sen. Rockefeller authored the bipartisan bill, which reaffirms Congress’ support to enforce existing indecency laws, but has not taken any steps to have it moved to the floor. The bill has already been passed in committee, and the Senate could vote on it today if it wanted to!

I realize that I just asked you to take action on another issue, but the need to restore the FCC’s power to fine broadcasters for airing indecent content is urgent. We need to let the Senate know that lip service to our values is simply not enough.

Thank you for taking steps to help prevent broadcast television from plunging our children into an unguarded media cesspool.

For more information:

Court throws out fine for indecent ‘wardrobe malfunction’

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Addictions, Substance Abuse, Children, Living, Health, Citizenship, Legislation

2 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Aug 19th, 2008, at 10:55am, eric wrote:

Such hysterical over-reaction to a fleeting image of less than a second demonstrates bizarre [and unhealthy] fascination the Baptist sect has with the human body! Using this as a platform to acheive censorous control of public airwaves really IS broadcast indecency.

2 On Oct 15th, 2008, at 12:37pm, Frank Johnson wrote:

If anyone has a “bizarre [and unhealthy] fascination ... with the human body” it surely is not “the Baptist sect.” Public modesty regarding the human body has been a feature of civilized society since the fall of humanity (though I realize this is a theologically shaped statement). It seems that this “unhealthy fascination” with the human body is being promoted by those who stand to profit from the body’s (over)exposure. Our society has always practiced imposed restraint on public expressions of sexuality. What this legislation intends is that the laws already on the books simply be enforced. Good idea.

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com