Living Wills - Will to Live

By Jerry Price - Jan 9, 2006 - comment

“An 89 year-old woman who suffered a debilitating stroke is being denied life-sustaining food and water by her family and doctors—a court said it was okay because Doris Smith signed a living will. The daughter of the woman argues, however, that her mother never intended to be starved to death when she signed the legal document before her stroke.

“‘Most people have no idea that when it states in a Living Will/Power of Attorney that no further medical treatment will be provided in certain circumstances that it means they will also be denied food and fluids,’ according to Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition. ‘The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition is called regularly by people who have no intention of granting their doctor or family members the right to dehydrate and starve them to death and yet have a Living Will/Power of Attorney document that would do just that.’”

Louisiana Court Allows Family to Withdraw Life-Sustaining Nutrition, Hydration from Mother, August 23, 2004 [Accessed August 25, 2005]

With all of the modern advancements in medical technology, more and more people are being placed on some kind of artificial life support system (i.e., ventilators or feeding tubes) prior to death. That being the case, end-of-life decisions may be made that do not coincide with the wishes of a patient if that person becomes unable to communicate. Some kind of advanced directive (AD) that details a person’s wishes concerning medical treatment would seem to be advisable. Standard forms are available in most, if not all, states that allow for advanced directives.

But many states define a terminal illness to include such things as “kidney failure from which you’ll die without treatment but might survive indefinitely if treated. Forbid treatment if you’re ‘terminally ill,’ and you unwittingly cut off a potentially long life.” However, only a few states have a provision that allows a person to reject certain procedures while allowing for others. For that reason, a person may not want to use the standard state form but choose a form that allows for feeding and hydration when death is not eminent from a non-treatable medical problem. The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) has such an instrument called a “Will to Live” which can be downloaded from their website at http://www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/willtolive/StatesList.html .

Burke Balch of the NRLC says, “Certainly, people should be encouraged to make their treatment wishes clear through advanced directives. But any program promoting advanced directives must allow informed and specific decisions, with at least the equal option of choosing life.”

“Make Sure ‘Life’ Is An Option,” http://www.usatoday.com , October 30, 2003 [Accessed September 14, 2005 – Access fee required]

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, End-of-Life Issues

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com