Pentagon agrees it cannot sponsor Boy Scout troops

By Tom Strode - Nov 30, 2004 - comment

The Department of Defense has absorbed criticism for agreeing with the American Civil Liberties Union to inform its military bases worldwide they cannot officially sponsor Boy Scout units.

The settlement in a lawsuit in Chicago, Ill., is limited in scope and is only a clarification of previous policy, according to the Pentagon. Critics of the action, however, said the department should not have backed down to the ACLU’s charge of religious discrimination against the Boy Scouts.

“The Pentagon ought to show some backbone,” said Gary McCaleb, senior counsel of the Alliance Defense Fund. “The ACLU is an oppressor, not a protector, of religious liberty.”

The Pentagon denied it officially sponsors Boy Scout units, adding its policy does not allow sponsorship for any private organization.

“The settlement does not prohibit the Department of Defense from supporting the Boy Scouts of America,” the Pentagon said in a Nov. 16 statement. “Boy Scout units are permitted to meet on military bases, and military personnel are allowed to remain active in Boy Scout programs.”

The ACLU charged DOD units have held charters for hundreds of Boy Scout troops and Cub Scout packs. DOD did not acknowledge any wrongdoing in the settlement.

In recent months, the Boy Scouts of America has sought to make sure it is in compliance with the DOD policy, BSA spokesman Bob Bork said. The organization has worked to verify sponsorships are held by such groups as the American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars and churches, he said.

The question in the case of whether DOD may continue to provide funds for the Boy Scouts has yet to be settled.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Church and State, Community Service, Social Issues

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com