State Dept. urged to penalize Vietnam

By Tom Strode - Sep 8, 2008 - comment

A bipartisan commission has urged the U.S. State Department to return Vietnam to its list of the world’s worst violators of religious liberty.

The recommendation came in a report from the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) on the Southeast Asian country, which is under the rule of a communist regime. Based on its fact-finding trip to Vietnam last fall, the commission reported most of the country’s religious groups continue to suffer repression from different levels of government.

The State Department removed Vietnam from its “countries of particular concern” (CPC) in November 2006. CPC designation is reserved for governments that are particularly severe violators of religious freedom. USCIRF objected to the decision and has urged since then for Vietnam to be restored to the CPC list, a request that has not been granted.

In the new report, USCIRF said Vietnam made some helpful changes after it was given CPC status in 2004 but said it is incorrect to contend the government “is fully committed to respecting religious freedom instead of maintaining control of its diverse religious communities.”

Vietnam should be re-designated as a country of particular concern because, among other reasons, it continues to imprison many people based on their religious faith, to exercise control over most religious groups and to prohibit independent religious expression, according to the USCIRF report.

Particular targets for government repression or imprisonment, according to USCIRF, include Montagnard and Hmong Protestants; Catholics; the United Buddhist Church; and Khmer, Hoa Hao and Cao Dai Buddhists.

Felice Gaer, USCIRF’s chair, called on the U.S. government to pressure Vietnam to lift restrictions on religious groups and to release prisoners of conscience.

“Improved conditions for some only emphasize the inexcusability of ongoing abuses endured by others,” Gaer said in a written statement upon the report’s Aug. 25 release. “The State Department should not diminish its categorization of Vietnam as a severe violator until the Vietnamese government demonstrates a countrywide, non-discriminatory commitment to religious freedom and human rights for all.”

The State Department never released a CPC list in 2007 and has yet to issue one this year.

USCIRF is a nine-member panel that advises the executive and legislative branches of the federal government on religious freedom conditions overseas. The president selects three members of the commission, while congressional leaders name the other six. The State Department’s ambassador at large for international religious freedom serves as a non-voting member of the panel. Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, is a USCIRF commissioner.

The International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA), which celebrates its 10th anniversary this year, requires the president to act to bring change in countries designated as CPCs. Under the act, the State Department has 90 days after designation to decide the policies it will utilize with the CPC designees. The act requires the president to take specific actions against governments designated as CPCs. He is provided a range of options, from diplomacy to economic sanctions. The president also has the authority to waive any action.

USCIRF’s report on Vietnam may be accessed online at www.uscirf.gov.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Human Rights, Religious Liberty

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com