Texas polygamy; God’s standard for marriage

By Alan Branch - Apr 28, 2008 - 8

Christians around our country have been deeply disturbed by the recent events in Eldorado, Texas. On April 4, law enforcement officials raided the Yearning for Zion Ranch outside Eldorado and removed women and children from the polygamist compound. Yearning for Zion Ranch is owned by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (LDS), a Mormon splinter-group founded in 1935 near Short Creek, Ariz., a town now known as Colorado City. This group claims that the main LDS church is apostate because it abandoned its public advocacy of polygamy in 1890 in order to facilitate statehood for Utah. The head of the church, Warren Jeffs, was sentenced in November 2007, to two consecutive five-year sentences in Utah after being convicted of charges related to the rape of a 14-year-old girl who wed her cousin in an arranged marriage in 2001. The raid at the compound in Eldorado was prompted by an anonymous phone call from a 16-year-old girl who claimed she had been forced into an arranged marriage with a 50-year-old man and had given birth to a baby when she was 15.

Related commentary by Richard Land, writing for the Wall Street Journal: Children First.

Numerous groups have advocated polygamy, or more specifically, polygyny—marriage with two or more women. Islam allows for a man to have up to four wives, though the Prophet Muhammad had a special dispensation from Allah for more than four. In some tribal cultures polygamy is expected and the practice has posed real challenges for Christian missionaries. In the United States, the most famous advocates of polygamy have been Joseph Smith and Brigham Young. The evil leader of the Branch Davidians, David Koresh, also claimed the right to have plural wives, many of them young girls.

It is not uncommon for advocates for polygamy to claim the Bible does not prohibit plural marriages. They also claim that the examples of polygamous marriages by Old Testament patriarchs, like Abraham and Joseph, or Israelite kings, like David and Solomon, are examples of tacit approval by God of polygamy. How should Bible-believing Christians respond to these claims? I want to assert that the Bible is not vague, but quite explicit in its advocacy of heterosexual and monogamous marriage as God’s standard.

The foundational passage pertaining to marriage in Scripture is Gen. 2:24-25: “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.” The ideal of oneness which God expects in marriage can only be found in a monogamous marriage. Jesus Christ himself reaffirmed this as God’s ideal in Matthew 19:4-6. Other passages in the Old Testament assume monogamy and not polygamy as God’s standard. The strong condemnation of adultery in Proverbs 5 only makes sense when understood from the perspective of monogamy. Psalm 128:3 says, “Your wife shall be like a fruitful vine.” Notice the text refers to the wife (singular) and not to wives (plural). Old Testament scholar Walter Kaiser also insists that Lev. 18:18 is a prohibition against polygamy. In the New Testament, the Apostle Paul insists that each man “should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband” (1 Cor. 7:2). The entire context of marital instructions in Eph. 5:22-6:4 and Colossians 3:18-19 only makes sense when understood from the perspective of monogamy. I would also add that no major tradition of the Christian Church has ever endorsed polygamy. Groups that do endorse polygamy invariably do so because a so-called prophet has gotten a new word from God to justify his own sinful indulgences.

What are we to do with the examples of the Patriarchs? To begin, let us clearly state that sometimes the major characters of the Old Testament are bad examples! There is no case of a happy description of a polygamous relationship in the Old Testament. Instead, one finds jealousy (1 Samuel 1), family conflict (Rachel and Leah), and religious apostasy (Solomon) all directly connected to polygamy. Most advances of polygamy make a major hermeneutical mistake by failing to differentiate normative didactic passages in Scripture from passages that are merely historically descriptive. Passages of Scripture which are clearly didactic all presuppose heterosexual, monogamous marriage as the expected standard.

The tragic example of Eldorado also demonstrates that polygamy, especially as practiced today, is almost universally a tool used to exploit women. What many of these modern groups call polygamy could more accurately be described as lewd behavior and adultery practiced under the guise of religion. Pre-arranged marriages between very young girls and much older men are very common in these groups, a practice which should be called what it is—child abuse. Most polygamous groups are also manipulative in that a prophet or spokesman for God will tell women and young girls that “God says this is what you must do.” In this sense, polygamy often entails blasphemy in that God’s name is invoked to justify a man’s own sensual lusts.

With the growth of the Muslim population in the United States, the issue of polygamy will only become a more common debate. Christians must think carefully and clearly so as not to be confused about the acceptability of polygamy simply because various patriarchs engaged in the practice. The Bible often records events which did not have the approval of God. Good hermeneutics and diligent study of the entire corpus of Scripture has led the Christian Church to the universal opinion that God has ordained heterosexual, monogamous marriage as the appropriate arena for sexual expression.

This article is reprinted from the April 22, 2008, issue of The Pathway, the newspaper of the Missouri Baptist Convention. The author, Dr. Alan Branch, is vice president for student development and assistant professor of Christian ethics at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Kansas City.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to preserve the institution of marriage and the value of family in the lives of Americans. To learn more about these important issues, additional resources are available here. If your church is interested in purchasing materials on marriage and family, please visit our online bookstore.

Related commentary by Richard Land, writing for the Wall Street Journal: Children First.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Faith, Bible, Family, Marriage, Husbands, Wives

8 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Apr 30th, 2008, at 7:12am, Beverly Bressler wrote:

While I agree that the Word of God does not support Polygamy, I am wondering about taking all the children away from their parents and putting them in foster homes.  I’m not sure the Word of God supports that either.  What do you Think.

2 On Apr 30th, 2008, at 9:17am, Richard O Davis wrote:

These events should be of great concern to the christian community. I am in complete agreement with this article (amen).  But the actions of the state coming in and take children from their homes.  What is to stop this action from being repeated because I teach my children to fear God and seek his ways so that their lives maybe long.  Satan has away of twisting mans thoughts to accomplish his goals to destroy believers.  I don’t know the answer but I know that we must be vigilant to these situations and be there like the church was in this situation and show people the real God of THE BIBLE.

3 On Apr 30th, 2008, at 7:05pm, Sarah wrote:

If the fruit is ROTTEN than the tree is BAD.........
age 13 and 14 year old girls forced to have sex!!!
.......then have babies............
Religion and Belief is a sacred thing but These SICK men have ruined what many inocent followers are being traped in.  A society of CONTROL , mental abuse, sexual abuse.

NO matter how you slice it :  IT is DISGRACFUL!!!!
These young girls deserve a chance at FREEDOM and a childhood.!!!!

4 On May 1st, 2008, at 12:05pm, Matt Hawkins wrote:

Beverly said:

“...I am wondering about taking all the children away from their parents and putting them in foster homes...”

Richard said:

“But the actions of the state coming in and take children from their homes.  What is to stop this action from being repeated because I teach my children to fear God...”

You both raise good questions.  You may be pleased to know that Richard Land has written an article wrestling with these very questions… freedom of religion v. protecting children. This article is scheduled to run in the Wall Street Journal tomorrow (May 2).

I’ll post a link to it on this thread once it’s online.

mh

(ERLC Staff)

5 On May 2nd, 2008, at 9:50am, Matt Hawkins wrote:

As promised:

Richard Land answers this question:

“What should Americans make of all this? How do we respect religious freedom while protecting children?”

...in today’s Wall Street Journal.

Read Children First at WSJ.com

6 On Jun 4th, 2008, at 2:37pm, Randy wrote:

Using the basic “Reformation Hermeneutics” to establish Biblical doctrine, plural marriage is not forbidden in Scripture. Abraham, Jacob, Caleb, Gideon and David all practiced it, and were never corrected, disciplined or encouraged to abandon it anywhere in Scripture. Yet, Gideon was called to ministry while practicing polygyny. David was seriously corrected for “adultery” because of Bathsheba. Moreover, if polygyny was sin, the God of the universe, 100% pure, would have never used Himself as a metophorical example of a practicing polygynist - that would contradict His very character!

Blessings!

Pastor Randy

7 On Jun 6th, 2008, at 11:47am, Beverly Bressler wrote:

Pastor Randy,
While the bible doesn’t specifically call polygamy sin, Gods best for us is when a man (one) leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife (one).  While may of our fathers had more than one wife, it almost always was a problem.  Review Jacobs story with the rivalry that was always present between Leah and Rachael, and how about all the problems between Davids children.  Or how about Ishmael and the decendants of Abrahams other children to Katora??  Aren’t christians still having problems with them???  Gods best comes through the relationship of one man with one woman.  As Jesus said, Moses allowed a man to divorce his wife because of mans shortcomings, not because it was Gods will for us.

8 On Jun 13th, 2008, at 10:48am, Pastor John wrote:

The old Covenant is not applicable since we have the new and better Covenant. I do not even advise reading the old Covenant. The Epistles are really applicable to the church today. Even the Gospels were under the old Covenant. The new Covenant started when Christ died and was resurrected. As the Apostle Paul said, let us move onto maturity in the faith.

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com