Traditional Marriage Wins Big

By Richard Land - Nov 7, 2008 - 3

wedding couple on bridge

Social conservatives and defenders of traditional marriage won tremendous strategic victories in ballot initiatives on Nov. 4. First and foremost, the defenders of traditional marriage overturned the California Supreme Court’s legalization last June of same-sex marriage.

Despite being outspent nearly 2 to1 and having to overcome California Attorney General Jerry Brown’s arbitrary decision to rewrite the original ballot language of Proposition 8 in a way calculated to present it in the most negative light possible, the proponents of traditional marriage won by a 52 percent to 48 percent margin.

This column originally published at Casting Stones, a blog hosted by Beliefnet.com.

Given the demographics of California, traditional marriage advocates would be justified in concluding that if they can prevail in California, they can prevail anywhere in the United States when the issue is put directly to the people to decide.

Traditional marriage also won an impressive victory in Florida. That state’s traditional marriage advocates had a particularly difficult barrier to overcome—a state requirement that any constitutional amendment garner a minimum of 60 percent of the vote. In fact, the opponents of same-sex marriage exceeded that legal hurdle by gaining a 62 percent to 38 percent victory in spite of being outspent 3 to 1 by their opponents.

In Arizona, the only state that has ever voted down a state constitutional amendment defining marriage as only between a man and a woman (in a very close vote in 2006), traditional marriage advocates returned this election cycle with an amendment which contained much clearer language. The result—the passage of a state constitutional amendment by a 56 percent to 44 percent margin, which not only defines marriage as being only between one man and one woman, but also prohibits Arizona from recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states.

Why did the defense of traditional marriage win such strong victories in states as diverse as California and Florida? One reason is that turnout increased substantially among the African-American population as they came out to vote for Barack Obama. In California, 70 percent of African-Americans voted for Proposition 8 (outlawing same-sex marriage) and 71 percent of black voters supported traditional marriage in Florida.

Ironically, the Obama-inspired surge of black voters helped pass constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage in two states carried by Sen. Obama—California and Florida.

This column originally published at Casting Stones, a blog hosted by Beliefnet.com.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to preserve the institution of marriage and the value of family in the lives of Americans. To learn more about these important issues, additional resources are available here. If your church is interested in purchasing bulletin inserts or other materials on marriage and family, please visit our online bookstore.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Marriage, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality, Citizenship, Christian Citizenship,

3 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Nov 27th, 2008, at 1:52pm, Tim Jolly wrote:

It doesn’t make any sense to me that Dr. Richard Land thanking the Mormon Church for their support for prop 8 in California. The Mormon Church is an occult! The Mormon Church doesn’t recognize that Jesus is the Son of God!

It makes me sick to have one our Executives play along with the media to make every religious group happy. As far as I’m concerned
Dr. Richard Land is talking out both sides of his mouth. I assume I’m the only Christian first Southern Baptist second that feels this way. One more thing and I’ll close. The Bible
talks about this. Hello is anybody separating themselves from the world and the garbage that it offers!

Sincerely,
Tim Jolly

2 On Dec 10th, 2008, at 2:53pm, kristal wrote:

I strongly disagree with this viewpoint. we are to be the light of the world. If we see good being done we are to encourage it, likewise if we see an evil we are to speak against it. At any point when we see someone doing good in this world we should be encouraging it. The Mormen church, while they are a cult, also stands along side us to defend biblical values we hold to be true. While we strongly contest their false doctrine we have a responsibility to stand for truth whether or not we agree with everything the Mormons profess. You wouldn’t not order your taco because the people standing behind you in line have different values and beliefs? We’re fighting for the same thing, on THIS issue, at the end it’s about getting the taco.

3 On Dec 16th, 2008, at 11:43pm, James Reeves wrote:

I have a question for the Obama voters that voted against the same-sex marriage. Did you vote as a block to remain the exclusive minority and recipent of civil rights program dividends?
The racial voting block of people in our country show a picture of the past. It is segregation in another form.
We must adhere to a rule of reason in voting that seeks a greater good and can lead to a better relationship with all others. The book of Romans is the best guide when considering homosexuals as a norm.

James

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com